SlowMist Annual Security Report: Security incidents throughout the year resulted in approximately $2.935 billion in losses, with Generative AI frequently used as an attack tool
BlockBeats News, December 30, according to SlowMist Blockchain's incomplete statistics, there were a total of 200 security incidents throughout the year, resulting in a loss of approximately $2.935 billion. Compared to 2024 (410 incidents, loss of approximately $2.013 billion), although the number of incidents has significantly decreased, the loss amount has increased by about 46% year-on-year.
From the ecological distribution perspective, Ethereum remains the most frequently attacked and severely affected ecosystem, with an annual loss of approximately $254 million, significantly ahead in proportion; BSC follows closely behind, with related losses of about $21.93 million; Solana ranks third, with an annual loss of approximately $17.45 million.
Divided by project track, DeFi projects are the most commonly attacked area: in 2025, there were a total of 126 security incidents, accounting for approximately 63% of the total for the year, resulting in a loss of approximately $649 million, a decrease of about 37% compared to 2024 (339 incidents, loss of $1.029 billion). There were only 12 exchange platform incidents, but they resulted in a significant loss of $1.809 billion, with Bybit alone losing approximately $1.46 billion in a single incident, making it the most serious incident of the year.
Looking at the reasons for the attacks, contract vulnerabilities are the main cause, with a total of 61 cases; X account breaches follow closely behind, with a total of 48 cases.
The report points out that with the accelerated popularization of Generative AI in the past two years, attackers have also begun to incorporate it into their fraud and attack chains. Compared to traditional tools, the ability of AI in text, voice synthesis, image, and video generation has significantly reduced the cost of fraud. Attacks no longer rely on rough wording or obviously abnormal behavior but instead through highly realistic content, coherent interactions, and precise object selection, make it more difficult for victims to perceive risks at a psychological level.
You may also like

Polymarket vs. Kalshi: The Full Meme War Timeline

Consensus Check: What Consensus Was Born at the 2026 First Conference?

Resigned in Less Than a Year of Taking Office, Why Did Yet Another Key Figure at the Ethereum Foundation Depart?

Russian-Ukrainian War Prediction Market Analysis Report

Ethereum Foundation Executive Director Resigns, Coinbase Rating Downgrade: What's the Overseas Crypto Community Talking About Today?

Who's at the CFTC Table? A Rebalancing of American Fintech Discourse
AI Trading vs Human Crypto Traders: $10,000 Live Trading Battle Results in Munich, Germany (WEEX Hackathon 2026)
Discover how AI trading outperformed human traders in WEEX's live Munich showdown. Learn 3 key strategies from the battle and why AI is changing crypto trading.
Elon Musk's X Money vs. Crypto's Synthetic Dollars: Who Wins the Future of Money?
How do Synthetic Dollars work? This guide explains their strategies, benefits over traditional stablecoins like USDT, and risks every crypto trader must know.

The Israeli military is hunting a mole on Polymarket

Q4 $667M Net Loss: Coinbase Earnings Report Foreshadows Challenging 2026 for Crypto Industry?

BlackRock Buying UNI, What's the Catch?

Lost in Hong Kong

Gold Plunges Over 4%, Silver Crashes 11%, Stock Market Plummet Triggers Precious Metals Algorithmic Selling Pressure?

Coinbase and Solana make successive moves, Agent economy to become the next big narrative

Aave DAO Wins, But the Game Is Not Over

Coinbase Earnings Call, Latest Developments in Aave Tokenomics Debate, What's Trending in the Global Crypto Community Today?

ICE, the parent company of the NYSE, Goes All In: Index Futures Contracts and Sentiment Prediction Market Tool
